Critique of the National Consumer Law Center’s January 2015 Article:
Zombie Debt: What the CFPB Should Do About Collecting Old Debt
The National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) article, Zombie Debt is different from Ghost Debt : What the CFPB Should Do About Collecting Old Debt, published in January 2015, contains several inaccuracies, lacks context, and relies on flawed assumptions. Below is a detailed breakdown of the concerns with its arguments:
Overreach of the CFPB’s Authority
The article argues that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a federal agency, should have the power to ban the collection of debts outside the statute of limitations. However, this is a misunderstanding of the CFPB’s role. State statutes of limitations are governed by state law, and the CFPB does not have the authority to alter or override these statutes.
Oversimplification of Statutes of Limitations
The article fails to acknowledge that statutes of limitations can vary significantly, with some, such as for credit card debts, being as short as three years. The assumption that any attempt to collect a debt past the statute of limitations is inherently wrong ignores these nuances. For example, collecting on a three-year-old debt is far from unreasonable, especially when the debt may still be reported on credit reports.
Flawed View on Time-Barred Debt Collection
The idea that collecting time-barred debt is inherently wrong is misguided. While aggressive or unethical collection practices on such debts are unacceptable, the debt itself remains valid. Statutes of limitations do not erase the obligation to pay; they merely limit the ability to pursue legal enforcement. Consumers should not assume that collectors will only pursue legally enforceable debts, particularly when the debt is still within a reasonable timeframe or appears on credit reports.
Settling Time-Barred Debt collectors
Resolving time-barred debts through settlement is not inherently wrong and can be beneficial for all parties involved. However, ethical standards must be upheld. Debt collectors should avoid using dishonest tactics, such as making false threats of legal action or misrepresenting the nature of the debt.
Summary and Conclusion
The NCLC report centers on old debts outside the statute of limitations, but its recommendation for CFPB regulation exceeds the agency’s mandate. Furthermore, it overlooks the complexity of statutes of limitations and fails to recognize that collecting on time-barred debts, when done ethically, is not inherently problematic. Ethical and responsible debt collection is essential, and consumers should be educated about their rights and obligations regarding time-barred debts.
In conclusion, while addressing unethical practices in debt collection is important, the NCLC report oversimplifies the issues and misrepresents the regulatory capabilities of the CFPB. Responsible debt collection and informed consumers are key to navigating these challenges effectively.
.
Source link: